NRA CHALLENGES FEDERAL HANDGUN BAN FOR 18-20 YEAR OLDS

We have 20,000+ laws and regulations to be concerned with - most in possible derivation of the Second Amendment

Moderators: SomeGuy, tjbert47

NRA CHALLENGES FEDERAL HANDGUN BAN FOR 18-20 YEAR OLDS

Postby Tim Nunan » Thu Sep 09, 2010 1:49 pm

http://www.nraila.org/News/Read/NewsRel ... x?ID=14212

Wednesday, September 08, 2010


Fairfax, Va. -- The NRA is challenging federal laws that prohibit law-abiding Americans eighteen through twenty years of age from legally purchasing a handgun through a federally licensed firearm dealer. The case was filed Tuesday evening in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Lubbock Division. James D'Cruz of Lubbock, TX is the plaintiff in this case.

"In Heller and McDonald, the U.S. Supreme Court clearly stated that the Second Amendment guarantees a fundamental, individual right to keep and bear arms for all law-abiding Americans," said Chris W. Cox, executive director of NRA's Institute for Legislative Action. "That right is not limited only to Americans twenty-one years of age and older. Indeed, throughout our nation's history, adults beginning at age eighteen have served in the military and fought for this country with honor. But while the Supreme Court has consistently made clear that the federal government cannot ban or unduly restrict sales of items protected by the Constitution, the federal government continues to prohibit these adults from purchasing handguns from federally licensed dealers, which represent the largest and most accessible means of purchasing handguns."

The suit asserts: "At eighteen years of age, law-abiding citizens in this country are considered adults for almost all purposes and certainly for the purposes of the exercise of fundamental constitutional rights. Indeed, at eighteen, citizens are eligible (and male citizens could be conscripted) to serve in the military-to fight and die by arms for the country. Yet, Section 922(b)(1) prohibits law-abiding adults in this age group from lawfully purchasing -- from the most prevalent and readily available source -- what the Supreme Court has called "the quintessential self-defense weapon" and "the most popular weapon chosen by Americans for self-defense in the home."

The plaintiff, Mr. D'Cruz, is well-trained in the proper handling and use of firearms, including handguns. His initial training was with his grandfather, a World War II veteran, who wanted his grandchildren to understand the proper and safe techniques for use and storage of firearms. Mr. D'Cruz received further training from his father and as a member of the Navy Junior Reserve Officer's Training Corps, where he achieved the rank of Lieutenant Junior Grade. During his junior and senior years of high school, Mr. D'Cruz was a member of the JROTC's marksmanship team, and as member of that team has competed in regional and national marksmanship competitions. Mr. D'Cruz received numerous awards, including a first place medal for marksmanship, in a regional competition. Mr. D'Cruz also received a Foreign Legion unit award for marksmanship.

The case is D'Cruz v. BATFE.
Tim Nunan
TFA/NRA Lifemember
GOA member

"A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves." - Edward R. Murrow
Tim Nunan
 
Posts: 1247
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2003 2:24 pm
Location: Russellville, TN

Re: NRA CHALLENGES FEDERAL HANDGUN BAN FOR 18-20 YEAR OLDS

Postby macville » Thu Sep 09, 2010 9:36 pm

Glad the NRA is pushing this. It's absurd that someone who is legally an adult can't be trusted to buy a handgun...especially when most states allow someone under 21 to buy one legally in a FTF transaction. My take is, if we can't trust someone who's 18 with alcohol or firearms, then why do we trust them to vote or serve in the military? It's really simple logic that we've lost.
macville
 
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:21 pm

Re: NRA CHALLENGES FEDERAL HANDGUN BAN FOR 18-20 YEAR OLDS

Postby redbarron06 » Fri Sep 10, 2010 7:57 am

macville wrote:Glad the NRA is pushing this. It's absurd that someone who is legally an adult can't be trusted to buy a handgun...especially when most states allow someone under 21 to buy one legally in a FTF transaction. My take is, if we can't trust someone who's 18 with alcohol or firearms, then why do we trust them to vote or serve in the military? It's really simple logic that we've lost.

100%
Image
Member
Army Aviation Association of America http://www.quad-a.org/
National Rifle Association http://www.nra.org
Gun Owners of Americahttp://gunowners.org
Tennessee Firearms Association http://www.tfaonline.org
redbarron06
 
Posts: 335
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2008 3:12 pm


Return to Laws and Regulations

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron